Free Demo Class
Register for Free Demo Lecture & Test Series
Thank you for your registration.
For latest materials & updates keep visiting our website.
Failed to register. Please try again later!
Explanation: Many aspirants believe that reading multiple books for each subject is necessary.
Counterpoint: UPSC rewards conceptual clarity and revision over excessive book collection. It’s better to master 1-2 standard books per subject.
Example: For Polity, reading M. Laxmikanth thoroughly is more effective than juggling multiple sources.
Explanation: Some believe making handwritten notes is the only way to retain information.
Counterpoint: While notes are useful, digital notes or directly revising from books can also be effective. The key is efficient revision.
Example: Some toppers use Evernote or OneNote for digital notes instead of traditional notebooks.
Explanation: Many assume they need to buy new books every year.
Counterpoint: Standard books like Laxmikanth (Polity) and Spectrum (History) remain relevant for years. Only current affairs-related subjects require updates.
Example: The Economic Survey and Budget change annually, but Ancient & Medieval History books remain unchanged.
Explanation: Some believe reading The Hindu or Indian Express is all they need for current affairs.
Counterpoint: While newspapers are important, additional compilations (like Vision IAS, Insights) help with retention.
Example: Budget and Economic Survey summaries are better for UPSC than just newspaper articles.
Explanation: Many aspirants limit their preparation to the past year’s current affairs.
Counterpoint: UPSC asks questions covering 1.5 to 2 years of current events.
Example: Questions from previous years' events (like 2023 events in the 2025 exam) often appear.
Explanation: Many aspirants rely solely on a single coaching institute’s material.
Counterpoint: No single institute covers everything perfectly. It’s best to refer to multiple sources selectively.
Example: A mix of Vision IAS (Current Affairs), ForumIAS (Ethics), and NCERTs is a balanced strategy.
Explanation: Some believe that they must create separate notes for everything.
Counterpoint: For subjects like Polity, directly marking and revising from Laxmikanth can be more effective.
Example: Candidates like Anudeep Durishetty (AIR 1) used minimal self-notes and revised directly from books.
Explanation: Many believe joining test series is compulsory.
Counterpoint: Test series help, but self-practice with PYQs and standard sources is equally effective.
Example: Some aspirants clear Prelims by solving PYQs and mocks from free sources.
Explanation: Many think Prelims is a minor hurdle compared to Mains.
Counterpoint: Prelims has high unpredictability due to negative marking and elimination-based selection.
Example: Many aspirants who clear Mains easily struggle with Prelims due to tricky MCQs.
Explanation: Some believe that writing lengthy answers leads to more marks.
Counterpoint: Quality and structure matter more than length. Concise and well-structured answers score higher.
Example: A 150-word answer with proper Introduction-Body-Conclusion (IBC) is better than a long but unstructured response.
Explanation: Some aspirants try to memorize excessive data for GS.
Counterpoint: Using a few key statistics and reports smartly is more effective than cramming numbers.
Example: Instead of memorizing multiple poverty estimates, quoting NITI Aayog’s latest report is better.
Explanation: Many aspirants believe writing only in bullet points fetches higher marks.
Counterpoint: A mix of paragraph and bullet points works best, depending on the question.
Example: Analytical answers (e.g., ethics case studies) often need paragraph format, while factual ones (e.g., schemes) work well in points.
Explanation: Many believe neat handwriting guarantees high marks.
Counterpoint: Legibility matters, but content quality is the primary factor.
Example: Some toppers with average handwriting score well due to structured answers.
Explanation: Some aspirants study GS and Optional the same way.
Counterpoint: GS needs broad coverage, while Optional requires in-depth mastery.
Example: Public Administration GS answers need a generalist approach, while Optional answers require theory-based depth.
Explanation: Many think extra references don’t matter.
Counterpoint: Quoting committees (like ARC), Supreme Court judgments, and reports (like UNDP HDR) enhances answers.
Example: In Polity, quoting Keshavananda Bharati case for the Basic Structure doctrine strengthens the answer.
Explanation: Some believe writing something for every question guarantees success.
Counterpoint: Quality matters more than quantity—poorly attempted answers can lower overall marks.
Example: A well-written 15-answer attempt can score more than an average 20-answer attempt.
Explanation: Many ignore essay preparation, assuming GS knowledge is enough.
Counterpoint: Structured essays with philosophical, economic, and social dimensions score higher.
Example: AIR 1 2023 used quotations and diverse perspectives to score well in essays.
Explanation: Some aspirants prioritize Optional at the cost of GS.
Counterpoint: GS and Essay contribute 1250/2025 marks, making them equally important.
Example: Many candidates with high Optional marks failed due to poor GS scores.
Explanation: Some think longer answers fetch more marks.
Counterpoint: Marks depend on clarity, analysis, and relevance, not word count.
Example: Short but precise answers with facts, examples, and diagrams perform well.
Explanation: Many believe highly polished language is necessary.
Counterpoint: Simple, structured, and clear writing is the key to high scores.
Example: Using subheadings, examples, and flowcharts improves presentation, even with basic English.